by Euphro
user profile | dashboard | imagewall
HArd ROck
"Experience, a comb life gives you after you lose your hair" Judith Stern
Random Image:
Technorati Profile
You are visitor number since Valentine's Day 2006 (free counter from www.digits.com)
My video blog
My Flickr
RealClimate
yay!!
*waves*
very sensible - me too :)
Read Jon Courtney Grimwood 9tail fox last night. would be very interested in hearing what you think
It's a Grimwood book, so it's bound to be good.
(I've not read it yet either)
9Tail Fox is the only one of his books that I haven't read. He is very consistantly very good. The Red Robe series is still my favourites though.
I'd find it difficult to chose - which was the one based in Mexico City?
Prefer Michael Marshall Smith though
That's the Red Robe series. Or at least that's what I call it cause that's the first book in the set.
I shall have to look up Michael Marshall Smith though if he's better than Grimwood.
much punchier - heavy cyberpunk that's surprisingly well written (for the genre)
Thanks Euphro
Haven't read it yet but will - but I don't think he's the first because Brunner wrote something based on the idea well before Y2K
incoming
I know that Brunner and others were thinking about it a long time ago. The interesting thing about Bostrom is that he is presenting it as a serious proposition. I will check my e-mail asap :)
wow - read a few of the summaries now.
I like the implication that there's a theoretical technical basis or theoretical technical framework for alternate realities.
Years ago I read a book that linked the Zero Point Field (in quantum theory) with the idea of life force or communications or some such (didn't agree with much of it and only really remember the ideas it gave me). Interesting to speculate that the Matrix-or a RL equivalent- could be related to energy dynamics at this level
I've not read all of it yet (and might not), but it seems that the fundamental assumption is based on the same logic / theory that arrives at the assumption that 'we are not alone'. That feels a bit dodgy to me too..
Thanks
:-)
It's thought-provoking stuff, certainly :)
A science historian friend of mine has pointed out similar weaknesses in the arguments to the one you mention. It assumes we have all the information we need to come to a conclusion. :)