group profile | members | imagewall
simple - moblog the next number in the sequence.
No computer screenshots, or staged photos (ie: writing the number, arranging objects etc..) otherwise it's too easy. The challenge lies in spotting the number somewhere and snapping it before someone else gets there first. So, no cheating - unless you're particularly clever or funny, in which case you might get away with it.
Okaayyyy... A slight relaxening of the rules must be allowed with the numbers and all, lest we end up with a list made up solely of phonenumbers. Let me put on my heavy duty thinking cap and subject my hissyfits to strict analysis.
Heh. I said anal.
teflon says:
You think this counts as cheating?
Would it have been different if it it didn't have any of the 2 in it, or if I'd got a 118 118 person?
Joe says:
I don't think Rich is suggesting this is cheating, more that if we don't relax the rules a bit, we'll end up with lots of very similar images...
heh - "end up"
bang on the money J-dawg. I mean, all the picture we've had are great but I'd like to see if we could find more pictures from places further away than the place where the phonebook lives. In the words of my moblog and the hit BBC tv series - Look around you! Heavy plant has numbers all over it. As do many other things. Mix it up a bit people, it's not cheating if it's actuall *creative*... Of course this is a situation entirely of my own making, to a degree, so aploggies for anyone who possibly unjustly suffered my wrath up til now.
Thinking hat is still processing data.
heh. I said cess.
teflon says:
Well, not long now until I get to use a picture I took in the middle of nowhere.
Heh.. long.
Joe says:
dude, I saw the 123 sign, if it wasn't an abuse of my powers, I would so delete the current one and get you to post it,...no disrespect to nige for the 123 that made it through... but the layby 123 sign Rocks.
