by Steve
user profile | dashboard | imagewall
All work copyright protected unless otherwise stated. You may not use these pictures in any way without permission from the owner. But if you ask me nicely I am sure it will be fine :)
,news rags
,strap on sex
,twins
Erm, not feeling particularly comfortable with these pics and those of James's on the latest page .... is Moblog the right forum for such pics .... it is, or so I am given to be believed, a 'family ' blog ....
It's the front cover of a "news paper" In my opinion it makes it ok to show here. And I wasn't feeling particularly comfortable with it either, I'm not used to working on building sites and this kind of thing is very much the norm. It really is a different world.
Understand that ... I was just a bit taken aback .... I know these images are out there all the time .... and a lot of us come across them on a day to day basis ... I just wasn't expecting them to come up on Moblog ... though I do see they could well be a starting point for a useful debate ....
Hmmm. The placing of homosexuality firmly within the heterosexual frame, defining it in relation to the heterosexual "norm", thereby subsuming it into the "dominant" culture. Classic.
H, that was just what I was thinking...
Maggie, sorry didn't mean to jump down your throat, thanks for caring.
I thought so.
*Spits at The Sun et al, they're holding this nation's thinking back 100 years!*
I find it hard to believe anyone could have an honest and realistic discussion about homosexuality on any level while using those photos on the top as a guideline.
I've never seen moblog as a family friendly place. I can rarely think of a time when the front page (now the latest page) did not link to something I personally found to be trashy and not at all something I would encourage my daughter to stumble across. Of course it is usually in the latest comments section. Such photos typically get a lot of comments.
When I finally let her sign up, long after she first asked, I was very clear about where she was allowed to go, and that left a huge amount of moblog off limits.
That's not to say I think you are wrong to feel uncomfortable about seeing them on the main page, MaggieD. Your feelings are yours and are not up for public validation. I am just saying that I am surprised by the notion that the site is family friendly or that you don't regularly encounter similar-ish things.
I think one of the problems is a low reading age or English not being the native language to a lot of the people on this building site. If you are still learning English then I imagine that the Sun, Star, or Sport is quite accessible, which given those rags stance upon visitor to are shores is quite ironic.
OK, I know this is a bit of a niave question .... but is Moblog a designated 'family site' .... I know there are Primary School users and various educational blogs linked to it ....
Steve - I read a while ago that the language used in the Sun is pitched at a seven year old's reading age. My son could read it.
Oh, and Goode, I know you are a moderator, but I must say, after reading your blog and seeing you use it as a vehicle for a personal vendetta using some soft porn video footage, I am afraid I just can't give your opinion too much credence on this matter .... however I do applaude your creativity in CSS design and the other aspects of your involvement in Moblog ...
"MaggieD says:
and Steve, I didn't think you 'jumped down my throat' ... :)"
Good, sometimes I can be miss understood by my poor writing style.
I think that Moblog images are family friendly but quite a few of the conversations are not. I use this place as a diary and general record of my life, which means that sometimes it becomes a little "blue"